Mrs. Janet, a 40 year-old dealer who is furthermore a mother of
two, is habitually prepared to notify the story of her husband who
chucked caution to the wind and dozed with their only female child,
putting her in the family way against custom.
But she would habitually have herself to blame as she narrated that her extended nonattendance from home created the gap that not only ruined her wedding ceremony but destroyed what was left of her daughter’s life.
“I was not always round. At a time when my female child required motherly care and recommendations, I was not around. At the time she had her first menstrual period, my married man was at home with her and provided her the necessary care. But it turned out to be a sordid experience as the man took benefit of his growing daughter.
He began to doze with her after, telling her if he didn’t do that, the menstrual body-fluid would extend. That continued without my information until I found out the young female was sick. I got the shock of my life when I was told my female child was with child. More devastating was the detail that her father had been sleeping with her,” she lamented.
According to her, the husband primarily refuted responsibility. But after the intervention of their village head, he confessed to the misdeed. “He was interrogated by the policeman, but he refuted. Our king intervened and also interrogated him and he later confessed to the crime,” she asserted.
On the penalty meted out to him, Janet said as is customary in the African heritage, he was banished by the monarch from the community. “He has been banished from the town, leaving me to take care of the 13 children,” she said.
Lamenting how she has been taking care of the young kids, she said the penalty should also have included taking care of the 13 young kids she has from the wedding ceremony.
“It has been very excruciating, a more critical punishment should have been given to him to take care of the young kids rather than departing me all alone to care for the 13 young kids. Although the man was not actually doing anything serious before the occurrence, he supported from the little retirement benefit he assembled from his former employer,” she disclosed.
But she would habitually have herself to blame as she narrated that her extended nonattendance from home created the gap that not only ruined her wedding ceremony but destroyed what was left of her daughter’s life.
“I was not always round. At a time when my female child required motherly care and recommendations, I was not around. At the time she had her first menstrual period, my married man was at home with her and provided her the necessary care. But it turned out to be a sordid experience as the man took benefit of his growing daughter.
He began to doze with her after, telling her if he didn’t do that, the menstrual body-fluid would extend. That continued without my information until I found out the young female was sick. I got the shock of my life when I was told my female child was with child. More devastating was the detail that her father had been sleeping with her,” she lamented.
According to her, the husband primarily refuted responsibility. But after the intervention of their village head, he confessed to the misdeed. “He was interrogated by the policeman, but he refuted. Our king intervened and also interrogated him and he later confessed to the crime,” she asserted.
On the penalty meted out to him, Janet said as is customary in the African heritage, he was banished by the monarch from the community. “He has been banished from the town, leaving me to take care of the 13 children,” she said.
Lamenting how she has been taking care of the young kids, she said the penalty should also have included taking care of the 13 young kids she has from the wedding ceremony.
“It has been very excruciating, a more critical punishment should have been given to him to take care of the young kids rather than departing me all alone to care for the 13 young kids. Although the man was not actually doing anything serious before the occurrence, he supported from the little retirement benefit he assembled from his former employer,” she disclosed.
No comments:
Post a Comment